Image Courtesy : The Hindu, Google |
Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI) in multi brand retail was one of the serious issues
that created a big debate in India last year. When the UPA government announced
its decision of allowing 51% foreign direct investment in the Indian multi
brand retail, it spurred controversies and agitation from the opposite party,
major activists and farmers. India is still considered as an agrarian country
as agriculture being the prime activity and source of income to the farmers. Ever since the importance given to the
industrial revolution leading to rapid economic growth the agricultural sector
has taken a back seat among the political fraternity. But a country like India where agriculture
has been in existence for years and continue to provide livelihood for many,
should not neglect this sector at any cost. The government over the years has
ignored this one particular sector and the plight of Indian farmers. This has
lead to the situation of stagnating agricultural growth and increasing suicides
among the desperate farmers. The only period in which agriculture was given due
importance and huge expenditure was implemented in this sector was during the
first five year plan. At this present scenario, where is the meaning to the
concept of inclusive growth and sustainable development?
The western
civilization is known for its robust technological advancement and extravagant
spending. India of late has become immune to these western practices due to
globalization and as a resultant of the change in taste and preferences of the
Indian consumers. Consumerism has grown over the years and people are now open
to new innovative products. The younger generations of India have become more
resilient and familiar with foreign brands. The urban youth are comfortable and
are gaga over foreign goods from English music to cosmetics and apparels.
Barack Obama, the president of the USA came in power with the election slogan “Change
is what America need and we will make the change happen” on the wake of the
financial crisis. He did know where to go for this change. Obama targeted the Indian
market to boost the American economy. The Indian retail sector is growing
tremendously since the new economic policy opened Indian market to the global
market in 1991. The Indian retail sector is the second largest source of
employment after agriculture and accounts for over ten percent of the total
GDP. This gives us a point that these two are the most important sectors that
generates employment opportunities for the mass of Indian population. The
Indian retail market is expected to grow at a faster rate in coming years and
hit $700 billion by 2015. The continuous growth in this sector is mainly
attributed to the increasing population and urbanization. India has the highest
rate of change in its urban population of all the BRICS nations. These have
created the interests of foreign investors and Obama to push the FDI policy in
multi brand retail in India.
Given the
growing transformation of the Indian retail sector the question is whether FDI
in this segment will create any good to the Indians. The answer could be not
much because of the varied composition of the Indian retail sector and keeping
in mind the informal nature of the Indian economy. The retail space in our economy
is highly fragmented and dominated by the unorganized sector namely the local
kirana stores and pavement vendors. However, issues such as this always have
its own good and bad. Let us analyze the various aspect of this decision. The
motive behind allowing FDI in the retail sector will act as a catalyst to spur
competition in the industry. The Indian retail sector in the recent years has
given importance to quality products and brands and this has encouraged foreign
investments. On this regard people of India now have easy access to quality and
new products. The FDI in Indian retail sector will develop infrastructure and
logistics which is now highly necessary for India to achieve its potential
growth target. This will also result in
increased global reach of the Indian goods and efficient production and
distribution system. The domestic demand in the recent years has declined as a
result of which India’s current GDP is low at 5.3 percent. The FDI in the retail sector will boost
domestic demand and take india on the path of increasing growth trajectory. The
foreign investment will improve storage facilities as India is the second
largest producer of vegetables and increase the shelf life of perishable goods.
This aspect is very important right from the time of production to the sales.
An efficient cold storage system avoids distress sales. As an increase in migration and urbanization
FDI in retail sector is likely to pay more for the workers. The FDI will
attract technological development and give Indian retail sector the touch of
sophisticated high end products and sevices. Many agricultural lands in India are fertile but face drought and lack good monsoon and that has resulted in low production and supply. Because of
this there is a huge demand supply mismatch. The big retail chains solve this
problem to a great extent. The Public Distribution System (PDS) in India is
inefficient with lot of leakages and the FDI in retail sector will improve the distribution
process and control inflation in the short run. India is also facing the
problem of twin deficit. The widening Current Account Deficit and fiscal
deficit is of serious worry. There has been huge trade imbalance as exports
have come down and imports are increasing sharply. In such a state it is high
time that we start attracting capital inflows and foreign cash flows to boost the
exports and domestic demand and finance the deficit. These are the only notable
major advantages of allowing FDI in multi brand retail in India.
The major
concern and claim over the FDI in retail space is that it will affect the small
retail shops and local kirana stores. On this regard the FDI in retail sector
and the welcoming of big foreign retail giants like walmart and carrefour will definitely
affect the local kirana stores but only to a certain extent. This is because
the foreign retailers concentrate only on the urban areas and the rural people
can still buy from their local stores and groceries with whom they are comfortable with. Even
in the urban area the majority of the people are in middle class who often visit
these small stores keeping in mind about their budget and continuing increase
in the prices of the FMCG goods. So the FDI in multi brand retail will only
favour the rich and the middle class on certain aspects. It will definitely not
increase employment opportunities in the long run. They have their own terms
and condition and that will only be given emphasis on the long run. They take
control of price and charge beyond the market price once they gain monopolistic
power. They follow predatory pricing. The FDI in retail sector is likely to
drain out the country’s share of revenue to foreign countries. The FDI in multi
brand retail will definitely affect the Indian farmers. Though they claim that
there exists transparency and the big retail giants directly buy the produce
from the farmers and pay them the correct price, this will never happen so. By
allowing FDI in retail sector it is likely to create an unhealthy competition
by not providing a level play for the domestic producers. The FDI policy is
bound to affect and dump the domestic producers.
FDI in multi
brand retail is good and can reap benefits only in the long run. The FDI policy
is such an important concept that has serious implication in the domestic
economy and foreign reserve of the country. The wise question to ask is what
sectors need the FDI policy? It is not all the sectors that need FDI. So it is
wise to allow foreign investment in particular sector that actually need FDI
like defense and health sector for instance. The current FDI limit in defense
is just 26% and now the union minister for commerce and industry, Anand Sharma
urged the government to raise the FDI to 74%. The FDI policy should be implemented and liberalized
in such a way that it benefits everyone and is in line with our objectives. The
finance minister in his recent budget has clearly defined and distinguished between
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Foreign Institutional Investment (FII).
This will reduce the ambiguity around foreign investments.One of the good part of this decision is that the central government has given the choice to the state government whether to welcome FDI in multi brand retail or not in their respective states. At the current
situation with slow economic growth and stagflation the FDI in retail sector
will boost the domestic demand and infrastructure. The finance minister in
recent times has also stressed many times the importance of FDI in retail and
it is necessary to meet the huge CAD and fiscal deficit. But recent reports
reveal that walmart spent about Rs. 125 crore lobbying Indian lawmakers to
enter the Indian market. This is something serious, government should be in favour
of the citizens and particularly farmers and not allow FDI with the motive of
bribery and increasing their own pocket. This is so easy to happen as
corruption is deep rooted in Indian politics. If this is going to be the primary
concern of our government then the FDI policy will not achieve the desired
results.